Mum's the word on climate change in Wisconsin

The Climate Change language police have struck again. Last month state employees in Florida alleged that Gov. Rick Scott had instituted a ban on using terms like "climate change" and “global warming."

Now climate censorship has spread to Wisconsin. Last week, the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands (BCPL), a three-member panel overseeing public land sales that benefit schools and communities in Wisconsin, voted to ban staff from talking about climate change. The panel voted 2-1 to block public employees "from engaging in global warming or climate change work while on BCPL time."

Sign here to tell Wisconsin Governor and Presidential hopeful Scott Walker that this is unacceptable, and demand that he act swiftly to reverse the board's decision.

This petition has a goal of 20000 signatures
4726-4750 of 15032 signatures
Number Date Name Your comment to Scott Walker
10307 3.5 years ago Mary Jane Hicks Whatever happened to the first amendment of freedom of speech?
10306 3.5 years ago Beatrice Kozak
10305 3.5 years ago Robert Luckett What could it hurt to have fresher air, a bluer sky, purer water, and healthier families, including yours, and all those that you love.
10304 3.5 years ago Susan Gardner
10303 3.5 years ago David Sturm
10302 3.5 years ago Carolyn Miller
10301 3.5 years ago Larry Smith-Black
10300 3.5 years ago Becky Fischer
10299 3.5 years ago Sheila Wyse
10298 3.5 years ago Linda Kane
10297 3.5 years ago Shawn Heiser
10296 3.5 years ago Diane Hendricks Seriously! What the F***?
10295 3.5 years ago Margaret Ellis
10294 3.5 years ago Nancy Langdon
10293 3.5 years ago William Watson
10292 3.5 years ago Henry Jackson This is silly and largely unenforcable. However, it still ought to be officially reversed because of its symbolic importance.
10291 3.5 years ago Gregory Gibson
10290 3.5 years ago Richard Musser Don't be stupid---censorship of certain words or phrases only make folks more curious----what are you hiding?
10289 3.5 years ago Amy Armistead Really Walker, censorship? What's next, burning witches?
10288 3.5 years ago Nada Ballator Climate Change: Inconvenient, but True!
10287 3.5 years ago Stuart Weinstock
10286 3.5 years ago Stephen Fisher It's a stupid rule. I would hope that even you would recognize that, although I'm not holding my breath.
10285 3.5 years ago Laurie Lamoreaux
10284 3.5 years ago William Forrest Ignoring the possibility of climate change and global warming is akin to the Camel who puts its head in the sand when it fears a lion might be approaching.
10283 3.5 years ago Clinton Nagel The science, any science should not be banned from discussion among state ranks or personnel just because it may be uncomfortable or go against your personal beliefs. With that unprofessional approa...
Next ->

  By taking this action, you agree to receive future updates from Environmental Action. We will never sell or share your name, and you may unsubscribe at any time.